Course Content
Management Foundations
Management: Concept, Process, Theories, and Approaches, Management Roles and Skills
0/3
Management Functions
Functions: Planning, Organizing, Staffing, Coordinating, and Controlling
0/3
Managerial Economics Foundations
Managerial Economics: Concept and Importance
0/2
National Income
National Income: Concept, Types, and Measurement
0/2
Unit I : Evaluation
Unit I : Evaluation
0/1
Unit I: Business Management and Managerial Economics

Hall and Hitch’s Full Cost Pricing Theory, proposed in 1939 is a concept in economics that explains how firms set prices based on their total costs rather than purely on market forces like supply and demand.

Key Ideas of Full Cost Pricing Theory

  1. Price Determination Based on Costs:
    • Firms calculate prices by adding a markup to their total costs (including both fixed and variable costs).
    • This approach ensures that businesses cover their costs and earn a reasonable profit.
  2. Markup Pricing Formula:
    • Average Cost Pricing = Average Variable Cost (AVC) + Average Overhead Cost + Normal Profit Margin.
    • Hall and Hitch call the average variable cost as an average direct cost.
    • The markup is typically a percentage of the total cost, covering expected profits.
  3. Avoidance of Competitive Price Wars:
    1. Businesses following full cost pricing tend to maintain stable prices rather than lowering them to compete aggressively.
    2. This prevents destructive price wars and ensures long-term profitability.
  4. Focus on Long-Term Stability:
    1. Instead of responding to short-term market fluctuations, firms set prices that allow for stable operations over time.
  5. Criticism of Full Cost Pricing Theory
    1. Ignores Demand Elasticity: It does not consider how changes in price affect consumer demand.
    2. Not Suitable for Competitive Markets: In highly competitive markets, firms might not have the power to set prices based on costs alone.
    3. Less Flexibility: Firms may struggle to adjust to sudden changes in external factors like recessions or inflation.
  6. Examples:
    1. Indian Railways: Indian Railways sets ticket prices based on total operational costs, including fuel, staff salaries, maintenance, and infrastructure, with a markup to ensure profitability. The pricing remains relatively stable despite short-term demand fluctuations, aligning with the full cost pricing principle.
    2. Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) – Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL): FMCG companies, such as HUL, follow full cost pricing while setting prices for products like soaps, shampoos, and detergents. Costs include raw materials, packaging, distribution, and marketing, with a consistent profit margin applied.

Conclusion:

Hall and Hitch’s Full Cost Pricing Theory is useful for businesses seeking long-term financial stability and avoiding excessive competition.
However, it may not be optimal in highly dynamic or competitive industries where demand and external factors significantly influence pricing.