Course Content
External Strategic Analysis
External Analysis, PEST, Porter’s Approach to Industry Analysis
0/3
Business Portfolio Analysis
Business Portfolio Analysis - BCG, GE Business Model, Ansoff’s Product Market Growth Matrix
0/4
Unit VI: Strategic Management

📘 General Competitive Strategies: Michael Porter: 1985

 

I. Introduction

Michael Porter

  1. Michael Porter, a renowned professor at Harvard Business School, introduced the General Competitive Strategies in his 1985 book Competitive Advantage.
  2. These strategies help businesses gain a competitive edge in the marketplace and focus on how a company can create and sustain competitive advantage.
  3. Michael Porter’s Generic Competitive Strategies framework is traditionally defined as 3 (three), but is often expanded into 4 (four) distinct quadrants in practical applications.

II. 📊 Key Dimensions of Strategy

Porter’s Generic Strategies are based on two key dimensions:

  1. 🎯 Scope of the Market: Broad (industry-wide) or Narrow (focused/niche)

  2. 🧩 Source of Competitive Advantage: Cost (lower cost) or Differentiation (unique offering)

 
The 3 Core Strategies
(Original Concept)
The 4 Quadrant Model
(Expanded View)
 

III. Risks Associated with General Competitive Strategy

According to Michael Porter, firms generally follow three generic competitive strategies: Cost Leadership, Differentiation, and Focus. Each strategy carries specific risks.

 

  1. Risks of Cost Leadership Strategy: Cost leaders may face risks such as technological imitation, cost inflation, or competitors achieving lower costs through innovation.

  2. Risks of Differentiation Strategy: Differentiation may fail if customer preferences change, price sensitivity increases, or competitors imitate unique features.

  3. Risks of Focus Strategy: Focus strategies are risky if the niche segment disappears, broad-market firms invade the niche, or customer needs converge with the mass market.

  4. Overall Risk: “Stuck in the Middle”: Michael Porter warned that firms trying to pursue all strategies simultaneously may become “stuck in the middle.”

    This means:

    • no clear competitive advantage,
    • higher costs,
    • weak market positioning,
    • lower profitability.